Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Part Two of a Two-Part Article
Last month, we discussed how brightly the spotlight is shining on ethics and compliance programs. We explained that Sarbanes-Oxley has a provision that provides Federal protection for employees of SEC registrants who report wrongdoing to the government and/or law enforcement. The Act has created a situation in which anyone who reports wrongdoing to the government and/or law enforcement is protected from employer retaliation under Federal Statute. And we urged that companies assess the effectiveness of their ethics and compliance efforts.
Having reviewed program design, board of directors and senior management, and employees in last month's article, we continue that theme, concentrating on vendors and customers, the assessment, and ongoing monitoring systems.
Vendors/Customers
Here are the key questions to assess:
Effecting the Assessment
Now that the questions have been asked, how is the assessment done? This author believes that an effective assessment should be conducted by an independent, objective and uninterested third party. The following is a list of general procedures likely to be performed when assessing a company's ethics and compliance program:
Identify and obtain a complete understanding of the business and compliance risks associated with the business, the ways noncompliance may occur and the conditions that give rise to them. Activities would include:
Assess the company's existing systems, practices and procedures to determine whether they have been designed to achieve and maintain reasonable assurance of compliance with applicable statutes and regulations affecting the company. This review should focus not only on the written policies and procedures, but also on the actual practices and processes in place. Activities would include:
Perform a detailed assessment of the company's financial, management and other practices related to each of the compliance risk areas under review. Activities would include:
Implementation of proposed enhancements to the ethics and compliance program, resulting from the findings in number three, would be addressed jointly by the third party conducting the review, company management and legal counsel. Activities would include:
Conduct of Training
The final aspect of the ethics and compliance program assessment is development of an ongoing monitoring process. Activities would include:
Conclusion
As an additional consequence of recent accounting-related irregularities, it is more likely that a company's independent auditor will be required to examine, assess and perhaps opine on the quality of a company's fraud prevention efforts; including the company's ethics and compliance program.
Part Two of a Two-Part Article
Last month, we discussed how brightly the spotlight is shining on ethics and compliance programs. We explained that Sarbanes-Oxley has a provision that provides Federal protection for employees of SEC registrants who report wrongdoing to the government and/or law enforcement. The Act has created a situation in which anyone who reports wrongdoing to the government and/or law enforcement is protected from employer retaliation under Federal Statute. And we urged that companies assess the effectiveness of their ethics and compliance efforts.
Having reviewed program design, board of directors and senior management, and employees in last month's article, we continue that theme, concentrating on vendors and customers, the assessment, and ongoing monitoring systems.
Vendors/Customers
Here are the key questions to assess:
Effecting the Assessment
Now that the questions have been asked, how is the assessment done? This author believes that an effective assessment should be conducted by an independent, objective and uninterested third party. The following is a list of general procedures likely to be performed when assessing a company's ethics and compliance program:
Identify and obtain a complete understanding of the business and compliance risks associated with the business, the ways noncompliance may occur and the conditions that give rise to them. Activities would include:
Assess the company's existing systems, practices and procedures to determine whether they have been designed to achieve and maintain reasonable assurance of compliance with applicable statutes and regulations affecting the company. This review should focus not only on the written policies and procedures, but also on the actual practices and processes in place. Activities would include:
Perform a detailed assessment of the company's financial, management and other practices related to each of the compliance risk areas under review. Activities would include:
Implementation of proposed enhancements to the ethics and compliance program, resulting from the findings in number three, would be addressed jointly by the third party conducting the review, company management and legal counsel. Activities would include:
Conduct of Training
The final aspect of the ethics and compliance program assessment is development of an ongoing monitoring process. Activities would include:
Conclusion
As an additional consequence of recent accounting-related irregularities, it is more likely that a company's independent auditor will be required to examine, assess and perhaps opine on the quality of a company's fraud prevention efforts; including the company's ethics and compliance program.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
During the COVID-19 pandemic, some tenants were able to negotiate termination agreements with their landlords. But even though a landlord may agree to terminate a lease to regain control of a defaulting tenant's space without costly and lengthy litigation, typically a defaulting tenant that otherwise has no contractual right to terminate its lease will be in a much weaker bargaining position with respect to the conditions for termination.
What Law Firms Need to Know Before Trusting AI Systems with Confidential Information In a profession where confidentiality is paramount, failing to address AI security concerns could have disastrous consequences. It is vital that law firms and those in related industries ask the right questions about AI security to protect their clients and their reputation.
As the relationship between in-house and outside counsel continues to evolve, lawyers must continue to foster a client-first mindset, offer business-focused solutions, and embrace technology that helps deliver work faster and more efficiently.
The International Trade Commission is empowered to block the importation into the United States of products that infringe U.S. intellectual property rights, In the past, the ITC generally instituted investigations without questioning the importation allegations in the complaint, however in several recent cases, the ITC declined to institute an investigation as to certain proposed respondents due to inadequate pleading of importation.
Practical strategies to explore doing business with friends and social contacts in a way that respects relationships and maximizes opportunities.