Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In this era of heightened scrutiny of health care practices, every provider of health care services or products (ie, medical practices, clinical laboratories, billing companies, durable medical equipment suppliers, etc.) must implement compliance plans to educate their employees to avoid questionable billing practices before they become the subject of government criminal or civil investigations or lawsuits. A voluntary and comprehensive compliance plan that addresses issues such as medical record documentation, billing, privacy and confidentiality, and fraud and abuse – which is implemented and complied with – may reduce the chances of an audit and minimize the criminal or civil liability of the practice or its principals in the event a problem arises. Under the sentencing guidelines issued by the U.S. Sentencing Commission, the sanctions that may be imposed for violations of the law may be reduced if the organization had an effective and meaningful compliance program in place before the bad conduct occurred. Therefore, even if the program failed to prevent and detect the illegal conduct, if the organization had in good faith taken reasonable steps to prevent such conduct from occurring, the criminal fines or other sanctions may be minimized.
In order to assist health care providers to develop and carry out effective and meaningful compliance plans, the Office of Inspector General of the United States Department of Health and Human Services (OIG) issued a series of compliance program guidelines, which include certain basic elements: 1) Creating and implementing written policies, procedures and standards of conduct; 2) Designating a compliance officer and/or committee, depending on the size of the organization; 3) Training and educating staff and employees; 4) Creating effective lines of communication between staff and the compliance officials; 5) Enforcing standards through well-publicized disciplinary guidelines; 6) Taking part in internal monitoring and auditing; and 7) Making prompt responses to detected offenses and implementing meaningful corrective action. The OIG recognizes that physician practices face financial and staffing constraints and not all elements of the model program can be implemented.
Any effort to create an effective compliance plan will involve identifying the areas of risk. This often requires focusing on areas that have been problematic in the past, such as coding and billing. Reviewing the claims denial history or claims that have resulted in repeated overpayment would be a logical place to begin. Such an exercise not only helps the practice identify significant risk areas, but will also improve cash flow by increasing the number of claims that are paid the first time they are submitted.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?