Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Editor's note: The first part of this article focused on various LLP statutes, including sample language, and the basics of the concept of indemnification. We now turn to the potential consequences of indemnification and the future of LLPs.
There are situations when indemnification against the partnership assets may indirectly obligate partners to outside creditors. While many LLP statutes hold that partners are not liable “either directly or indirectly, by way of indemnification, contribution, assessment or otherwise” for the specific claims in which their liability is limited, under contribution laws, many partners still may remain liable for some of the firm's general obligations, including obligations incurred before the firm registered as an LLP. Since, often times, the firm's assets must be exhausted before contribution obligations arise, it may be difficult to allocate the sources of the remaining partnership debt, and as a result, individual partners may indirectly pay towards liabilities for which they are otherwise protected. Bromberg & Ribstein, '3.09(b). There is an emerging trend by which partnership statutes require depletion of partnership assets before plaintiffs can proceed against individual partners for their vicarious. Bromberg & Ribstein, '3.08(b). The marriage of LLP statutes with the exhaustion requirement provides another layer of protection for law firm partners in preventing creditors from accessing partners' assets.
Generally speaking, indemnification is not a perfect solution. On one hand, it forces partners to contribute towards claims for which they otherwise have no vicarious liability. On the other hand, limiting a partner's right to indemnification can essentially deny them relief. In LLPs where the risk of vicarious supervisory liability is spread among the partners through indemnification agreements, it is the supervisory partners, rather than the tort creditors, that are left with the risk that the assets of non-supervisory partners would be inadequate or unavailable to pay the claims. Symposium, “Limited Liability Companies for Unincorporated Firms,” 64 U.Cin. L. Rev. 319, 331 (1996). As a result, supervising partners may take certain precautions, such as contracting to increase their profit shares and reducing their involvement with supervisory positions.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.