Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Credit for Payment of Marital Obligation
The former husband was entitled to a credit prior to transfer of a lump sum payment to the former wife because he made payments related to the parties' real property that were marital obligations. Chabbott v. Chabbott, 2001-05392, N.Y. Sup. Ct., App. Div, 2d Dept., June 16, 2003.
The parties were divorced in 1998. As part of the financial settlement, the former husband was required to make a payment to the former wife from funds held in escrow resulting from the sale of real property previously owned by the parties during the marriage. The former husband claimed he was entitled to a credit representing his share of carrying charges on the parties' former marital home, and another credit representing his share of carrying charges on the parties' former summer home. The appellate court agreed that the payments made by the husband were obligations of both parties because the parties' agreement indicated that the payments were marital obligations. In addition, the appellate court held that the trial court erred insofar as it denied the former husband's application for a credit for back taxes owed to the Internal Revenue Service. This too, was a joint obligation to be shared equally by the parties.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?