Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Look, But Don't Touch: The Consequences of Removing, Modifying or Destructing Visual Art in Buildings

By Joseph M. Beck and Pamela C. Mallari
August 01, 2003

Unknowing building owners can incur substantial liability when incorporating certain artistic works within their buildings. The Visual Artists Rights Act of 1990 (VARA), 17 U.S.C. 106A, limits the ability of a building owner to alter, move, or remove a “work of visual art.” This article will provide an overview of this statute and its interpretation and application by various courts.

VARA applies to works of visual art, defined as “a painting, drawing, print, sculpture, or photograph (but only photographs created for exhibition purposes) existing in a single copy or a limited edition of no more than 200 copies and … meet[ing] certain specified criteria as to signature and numbering.” The statute grants creator(s) of these works the rights to prevent removal, modification, or destruction of the work under certain conditions. It also grants certain “moral rights”: “attribution,” protecting (1) the author's interest in receiving recognition for the work, and (2) the artist's right to disassociate himself from a work altered in a manner the artist deems detrimental to his reputation; and “integrity,” protecting the artist's interest in preserving the work in its original form. These rights cannot be assigned or transferred by the artist and endure for the artist's life. Even if a builder, building owner, or architect purchases the work and the copyright, the artist still retains the right to prevent the modification or destruction of the work.

The greatest concerns to builders and building owners are the special rules under VARA that apply to works of visual art, such as murals, which are “incorporated in or made part of a building.” If a work can be removed without damage, VARA still requires notice to the artist and the opportunity to remove the artwork. If the artist removes the work at his or her own expense, title in the work is conveyed back to the artist. Works that would be harmed by removal cannot be moved unless an explicit waiver is obtained from the artist.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.