Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Verdicts

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
August 01, 2003

Doctor Proves Good Samaritan Law Applies to Him

A doctor was entitled to summary dismissal of a case against him for malpractice for actions that resulted in a birth injury because he proved that the Texas Good Samaritan statute applied to absolve him of liability. McIntyre v. Ramirez, Texas Lawyer, 7/7/03, Vol. 19; No. 18; Pg. 415, Case No. 01-1203, 6/26/03.

This medical malpractice action arose from the emergency delivery of an infant. Defendant Dr. Douglas McIntyre was not the mother's obstetrician, was not on call for her regular doctor and had never seen the mother as a patient before the day of delivery. The patient's own doctor was not present when the baby, which was large for its gestational age, was ready to be delivered. Nurses paged for a “Dr. Stork,” a code method of informing those in the hospital that a delivery is taking place without a doctor present and that a doctor is immediately needed. Dr. McIntyre responded to the page. When he arrived, there were indications of shoulder dystocia, a condition in which the infant's shoulder becomes lodged against the mother's pelvic bone. After several attempts to deliver the child, Dr. McIntyre reached inside the mother, moved the baby's arm to a new position, and delivered him. The baby was born with injuries to the soft tissues and nerves of his right upper extremity, neck and shoulder, resulting in permanent neurological impairment and partial paralysis.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.