Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As discussed on page 1 of this newsletter, the SEC recently issued 'Standards of Professional Conduct' for attorneys representing issuers before the SEC ' a new rule mandated by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. See 15 U.S.C. ' 7201 et. seq. The Standards clarify an attorney's 'up-the-ladder' corporate reporting responsibilities imposed by the Act. 17 C.F.R. ' 205.
An attorney must advise his or her client's General Counsel or CEO whenever he or she receives 'credible evidence, based upon which it would be unreasonable, under the circumstances, for a prudent and competent attorney not to conclude that it is reasonably likely that a material violation has occurred, is ongoing or is about to occur.' 17 C.F.R. ' 205.2(e). A 'material violation' is defined broadly as a material violation of a federal or state securities law, a material breach of a fiduciary duty under federal or state law or a 'similar material violation of any United States, federal or state law.' 17 C.F.R. ' 205.2(i).
Although the stated purpose of the Rule is to 'ensure the law is being followed,' it reaches beyond that laudable goal by requiring attorneys to report past material violations, even when such violations have long since ceased, and to ensure the corporate client engages in 'appropriate' remedial and preventive measures with respect to those past violations. SEC Release Nos. 33-8150, 34-46868; SEC Release No. 33-8185 at p. 9, available at www.sec.gov. Any attorney who violates these Standards can be subject to an SEC civil suit, disciplinary proceedings or cease-and-desist orders. 17 C.F.R. ' 205.6
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.