Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Most leases that provide for a pass-through of operating expenses to tenants provide for an equitable proration of such expenses for any partial lease year. The typical language provides that the tenant is liable for its proportionate share of operating expenses incurred by the landlord for any period during the lease term. The arithmetic is very simple ' if the lease expires on March 31st, the tenant is responsible for its share of expenses incurred by the landlord through March 31st. Some leases, however, have a more ambiguous, and from the tenant's perspective, troublesome, proration clause that provides in effect that the tenant is liable to the landlord for its share of all operating expenses incurred by the landlord during the entire calendar year during which the lease expires prorated on the number of days or months of the lease term during such calendar year. So if the tenant's lease expires on March 31st, and the landlord incurs a significant operating expense in September, the tenant is liable for one-fourth of its share of such expense, notwithstanding that the expense was incurred and paid subsequent to the end of the lease term. These provisions may often work unfairly to the landlord's advantage and the savvy tenant should carefully vet and negotiate any such clauses before executing a lease.
William R. Crowe is a partner at Mayo, Gilligan & Zito, LLP in Wethersfield, CT.
Most leases that provide for a pass-through of operating expenses to tenants provide for an equitable proration of such expenses for any partial lease year. The typical language provides that the tenant is liable for its proportionate share of operating expenses incurred by the landlord for any period during the lease term. The arithmetic is very simple ' if the lease expires on March 31st, the tenant is responsible for its share of expenses incurred by the landlord through March 31st. Some leases, however, have a more ambiguous, and from the tenant's perspective, troublesome, proration clause that provides in effect that the tenant is liable to the landlord for its share of all operating expenses incurred by the landlord during the entire calendar year during which the lease expires prorated on the number of days or months of the lease term during such calendar year. So if the tenant's lease expires on March 31st, and the landlord incurs a significant operating expense in September, the tenant is liable for one-fourth of its share of such expense, notwithstanding that the expense was incurred and paid subsequent to the end of the lease term. These provisions may often work unfairly to the landlord's advantage and the savvy tenant should carefully vet and negotiate any such clauses before executing a lease.
William R. Crowe is a partner at Mayo, Gilligan & Zito, LLP in Wethersfield, CT.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.