Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Office leases typically provide that the landlord will furnish services without additional charge, including heat, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) during 'normal business hours.' Many leases specifically denote such hours, sometimes including up to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, and also Saturday mornings. These hours are usually not controversial, but certain tenants sometimes negotiate the specific hours. The potential problem for tenants is that many leases state that a tenant will be billed for overtime HVAC (or other services) without specifying a rate for such services. This ambiguity allows unscrupulous landlords to gouge tenants for overtime services. A well-crafted provision should either specify the actual hourly rates to be charged by the landlord or provide for a fair mechanism to determine such rates. Asking for the specific rates in advance is prudent, depending on a particular building's floorplate and mechanical systems, overtime HVAC can be very expensive, and tenants should be aware of the expense before they sign the lease. At the very least, the landlord should be limited to charging the tenant for its actual out-of-pocket expenses, with no mark-up for profit or an administrative fee. A savvy tenant should also require the landlord to make such services available according to reasonable procedures, such as a phone call to the building manager, or the flip of a switch, as opposed to advance written notice to the landlord.
William Crowe is a partner with Mayo, Gilligan & Zito in Wethersfield, CT.
Office leases typically provide that the landlord will furnish services without additional charge, including heat, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC) during 'normal business hours.' Many leases specifically denote such hours, sometimes including up to 6:00 p.m. on weekdays, and also Saturday mornings. These hours are usually not controversial, but certain tenants sometimes negotiate the specific hours. The potential problem for tenants is that many leases state that a tenant will be billed for overtime HVAC (or other services) without specifying a rate for such services. This ambiguity allows unscrupulous landlords to gouge tenants for overtime services. A well-crafted provision should either specify the actual hourly rates to be charged by the landlord or provide for a fair mechanism to determine such rates. Asking for the specific rates in advance is prudent, depending on a particular building's floorplate and mechanical systems, overtime HVAC can be very expensive, and tenants should be aware of the expense before they sign the lease. At the very least, the landlord should be limited to charging the tenant for its actual out-of-pocket expenses, with no mark-up for profit or an administrative fee. A savvy tenant should also require the landlord to make such services available according to reasonable procedures, such as a phone call to the building manager, or the flip of a switch, as opposed to advance written notice to the landlord.
William Crowe is a partner with Mayo, Gilligan & Zito in Wethersfield, CT.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?