Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Federal agents descend upon a manufacturing facility of a publicly traded client that makes parts for Department of Defense contractors. The agents conduct a day-long search and drive away with hundreds of boxes of documents, as well as data downloaded from company computers. You are the company's counsel, and within 2 days you piece together the government's core theories and many of the 'facts' that caused it to conduct the search.
The government has filed under seal a detailed affidavit with the search warrant that could help formulate a strategy for your client. But obtaining it unsealed may be a mixed blessing: The affidavit is likely loaded with scathing allegations by a government agent ' complete with citations to fraud and corruption statutes and possibly RICO ' based on untested hearsay and the word of a whistleblower with a profit motive. Such allegations, if made public, could cause serious problems for your client. While the lawyer for an organized-crime figure without a good reputation to lose would want the affidavit unsealed, counsel for a business must weigh the potential damage from release of these allegations against the benefits to be gained from seeing the government's theories and 'facts' in the warrant affidavit.
The downside can be swift and devastating. For example, when the affidavit in support of a search warrant executed on a Tenet Health Care facility was unsealed in October 2002, Tenet's stock lost almost half of its value within 4 days. See The Wall St. Journal, Nov. 6, 2002, at A2. Besides harming reputation, unsealing may reveal proprietary or other sensitive business information.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?