Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
LEASES
Breach of a lease occurs upon failure to perform an absolute duty and the defense of anticipatory repudiation cannot be used.
The landlord sued the tenant alleging default under a commercial lease for failure to pay rent, utility expenses and the cost of renovations to the subject property that were the responsibility of the tenant under the parties' lease. The lease provided that if the tenant was in default of any term of the lease, the landlord could terminate the lease 14 days after written notice of termination to the tenant. After two separate written notices to the tenant advising the tenant of its defaults and including a written warning that the locks would be changed, the landlord proceeded with the termination of the lease ' 15 days after the first written notice to the tenant. The tenant alleged that the landlord had committed anticipatory repudiation of the lease by changing the locks on the premises. The trial court held that the tenant was indebted to the landlord for his failure to pay his debts under the terms of the lease. The appellate court affirmed, stating that the tenant was in breach of the lease by his failure to perform duties that had become absolute under the lease. The tenant's defense of anticipatory breach by the landlord failed because the tenant was already in default of his absolute duties under the lease at the time he claimed there was an anticipatory breach by the landlord.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.