Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

THE LEASING HOTLINE

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
August 18, 2003

FORECLOSURE

Purchaser of land at foreclosure needs proof of ownership to be entitled to rent. Mortgage Management purchased land with two billboards on it at a foreclosure sale. It received a Substitute Trustee's Deed at foreclosure that conveyed all the 'improvements, buildings … appurtenances thereon.” Mortgage Management sued Eller Media for the rental revenue it had received for its continued use of the billboards after Mortgage Management purchased the land. Eller claimed it owned the billboards: Eller Media's predecessor had constructed the two billboards on the property and the attorney representing Eller stated the billboards were the personal property of Eller and under a ground lease with the Ramada Inn. Evidence at trial included the lease and correspondence between the attorneys for Eller and Mortgage Management. One letter from Mortgage Management's attorney gave the other attorney the option of selling the billboards or removing them ' several months after Mortgage Management claimed to have bought them at foreclosure. The trial court granted Mortgage Management's motion for partial summary judgment, finding that Mortgage Management owned the billboards. Eller appealed both the finding and the damages.

The appellate court reviewed the record and concluded that Mortgage Management did not offer any proof that the entity that owned the foreclosed land had title to the billboards or that they were properly included in the conveyance. If the land owner did not own the billboards, they could not be sold at foreclosure and would not be included in the Substitute Trustee's Deed. Eller had produced evidence to establish the existence of questions of fact for trial regarding ownership of the billboards. Thus the appellate court vacated the summary judgment and remanded for trial.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.