Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

THE LEASING HOTLINE

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
August 18, 2003

Sublessor's Acceptance and Retention of Rent Check Created Month-to-Month Tenancy

A sublessor sued a sublessee for damages resulting from the sublessee's failure to vacate the subleased premises at the expiration of the sublease. The sublessee argued that he was a month-to-month tenant. The sublessor argued that the sublessee had no greater rights than the sublessor under the prime lease, which had expired. Thus, argued the sublessor, the sublessee had no legal basis to create a month-to-month tenancy. The court noted that this argument was not raised in the sublessor's motion for summary judgment and thus was not properly raised on appeal. It nevertheless considered the argument and disagreed with the sublessor. The court reasoned that even if the prime lease had terminated, a tenancy by sufferance still could have been created, legitimizing the sublessee's continued occupation of the premises. The sublessor had received and retained a rent check. He deposited the check and made no attempt to refund the payment until after the sublessee raised the defense of the creation of a month-to-month tenancy in an eviction proceeding. Furthermore, the sublessor argued for the first time on appeal, and with no factual support, that it inadvertently had deposited the check. The court, therefore, affirmed the trial court's denial of the sublessor's motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.

International Business Machines Corp. v. Joseph Stevens & Co., LP, 2715, 2716, N.Y. App. Div., 1st Dept., December 31, 2002.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.