Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
This is part two of a three part series on electronic issues related to litigation.
Just as general counsel and their outside litigation attorneys are getting familiar with the challenges of electronic discovery, the definition of what is discoverable has begun to broaden. In most of the literature on electronic discovery, the list of places where discoverable information resides is fairly standard and includes computer hard drives, servers, CD-ROMs, floppy disks, zip disks, backup media, e-mail servers, laptops, home computers, and hand-held devices. But, technology keeps changing to meet the visions people have for communicating with each other. As a result, emerging technologies facilitating business communications such as instant messaging (IM), chat rooms, Internet mail, streaming video, spontaneous conferencing, PDA/mobile phone blends, and digital voicemail are quickly becoming the next generation for electronic discovery.
The rules for pre-trial discovery have proven elastic enough to adapt to electronic discovery. Therefore, the rules will make newer technologies just as susceptible to the same inspection as hard drives, servers, peripherals and backup media. The courts are just at the cusp of providing specific guidance for emerging technology discovery. Until more guidance is available, it is imperative for general counsel to take an active role in understanding the technologies being introduced into the organization and the potential liability and discovery risk each poses for the company.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.