Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
When a taxpayer commences a real property tax review proceeding, his/her focus is on the bottom line ' the amount of the real estate taxes paid on that property and getting them reduced. These bottom-line taxes are, however, the end product of a multistep process that ultimately results in the tax bill issued for that property.
Working backward, the taxes billed are the result of the property's assessed value multiplied by the appropriate tax rates set by the various taxing jurisdictions within which a property is located. The tax rates are derived from that taxing jurisdiction's total budgetary requirements divided into the total taxable assessments available for taxation within that jurisdiction. For example, if a school district funded totally by property taxes requires a budget of $1 million and the assessments of the properties within its jurisdiction total $2 million then for each $1 of assessment, the school district would need to collect 50 cents in taxes. Consequently, if the budget stays the same but the overall taxable assessments within the jurisdiction are increased or decreased, the tax rate is affected inversely, although the total tax dollars collected remain the same.
Under an ad valorem tax system, the formula used to determine a property's share of the tax burden must reflect the value of that property in order to be constitutionally valid. In some jurisdictions, assessments are set at 'full value' so that the assessment is equal to the property's value as of a particular date. In that case, a property worth $250,000 would carry an assessment of $250,000. Full value for assessment purposes has been determined to mean market value, ie, what a willing buyer would pay a willing seller. Assessments may also be based on a uniform fraction of the property's full value. For example, if properties in an assessing jurisdiction are to be assessed at 10% of full value, that $250,000 property's assessment should be $25,000.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.