Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
This is part three of a three-part series on technology-related issues of importance to General Counsel.
The increasing pressure to produce electronic data and documents in native formats puts in-house counsel on the front lines during, and even prior to, the electronic discovery phase of litigation. The basic obligations in-house counsel have prior to potential litigation include developing a corporate strategy for electronic data preservation and retrieval, implementing the plan, documenting policies and procedures in writing, and disseminating the policies and procedures to appropriate internal parties. Missteps in any of these areas can and has led to various sanctions ranging from fines to default judgments.
Even with a data preservation program in place, the courts are reluctant to allow companies to hide behind the procedures when it is clear the destruction of evidence was intentional. General Nutrition Corporation (GNC) continued its standard document destruction policy despite the existence of a protective order requiring the retention and preservation of relevant documents. GNC did not instruct its employees to preserve relevant records or make any efforts that the records would be preserved. To make matters worse, GNC's president issued a memo to all employees advising them that the preservation order 'should not require us to change our standard document retention or destruction policies or practices.' The court ruled in Wm. T. Thompson Co. v. General Nutrition Corporation Inc., 593 F. Supp. 1443 (C.D. Cal. 1984), that the defendant's destruction of records, both paper and electronic, which it had reason to know were relevant to the case, warranted both monetary sanctions and a default judgment.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.