Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Managing Sarbanes-Oxley Requirements

By Russ Selinger
August 19, 2003

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act creates a number of new requirements for publicly traded companies that are intended to improve corporate governance and avoid another WorldCom or Enron. While many organizations have focused on the immediate requirements, more needs to be done to help create a corporate culture that both promotes legal and ethical business practices and provides employees with an effective tool to report fraud or accounting irregularities.

Companies that are serious about encouraging ethical business practices will approach this issue like they have addressed the harassment issue in the past few decades. Best practice companies established clear policies for zero tolerance of any form of harassment, educated their people on how to promote a harassment-free work environment and dealt expeditiously with issues as they arose. By implementing such a comprehensive approach to harassment, companies were able to reduce the incidence of harassment in the work place and minimize their exposure to expensive litigation.

Over the course of 2003, we expect many corporations to respond in a similar way to building a culture that values ethical business behavior. The four key best practices are:

  • Develop guidelines on appropriate business practices;
  • Communicate those guidelines to employees and offer regular training to educate people and reinforce how business should be conducted;
  • Establish a comprehensive and convenient process for employees to raise concerns to senior management and, as required by Sarbanes-Oxley, the audit committee; and
  • Implement policies to effectively address issues as they arise.

Web-based tools, with their ready availability, always-on nature, and relatively low cost to customize and deliver, will offer many companies an effective way to address and manage these new requirements and best practices. This article will cover how Web-based tools can help promote ethical business practices and, in turn, comply with requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Stranger to the Deed Rule Image

In 1987, a unanimous Court of Appeals reaffirmed the vitality of the "stranger to the deed" rule, which holds that if a grantor executes a deed to a grantee purporting to create an easement in a third party, the easement is invalid. Daniello v. Wagner, decided by the Second Department on November 29th, makes it clear that not all grantors (or their lawyers) have received the Court of Appeals' message, suggesting that the rule needs re-examination.