Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Legal, IT and business experts will gather in Washington, DC May 1 and 2 for the World Internet and Computer Law Congress.
Presented by the Computer Law Association (CLA) in affiliation with many U.S. and international trade associations and the ABA Section of Business Law's Committee on Cyberspace Law, the conference will focus on presenting hands-on strategies and solutions. It will include sessions on:
Former U.S. House Majority Leader Dick Armey is scheduled to be the first day's luncheon speaker. Armey, who played a key role in developing public policy affecting e-business and the Internet, will give a talk on the theme of 'Formulating Public Policy for Technology Markets.'
To register or for more information, go to the CLA's Web site at http://www.cla.org/. A copy of the meeting's brochure is available at http://www.cla.org/2003_wash_dc_brochure.pdf.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?