Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

How To Ensure DTPA Compliance

By Joy Thomas
August 23, 2003

Each state has incorporated a Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA), but the acts aren't the same, with states tailoring their law to meet the needs of constituents and e-commerce activity within their jurisdiction.

For instance, Texas' DTPA covers these aspects of breach of warranty:

  • Express warranty ' either written or verbal;
  • Warranties of merchantability ' in which the product can do what it is designed for; and
  • Fitness for a particular purpose in which the product can do what it was designed to do.

The Act also covers unconscionable acts that take advantage of consumers' lack of knowledge, capacity or ability.

The Lone Star State's act also covers false, misleading or deceptive acts, some of which include:

  • False misleading statements;
  • False advertising for sale of going out of business;
  • Promoting pyramid schemes; and
  • Advertising goods or services not intended for sale.

Illinois has a statute for business transactions called the Uniform DTPA. It defines deceptive trade practices that in the course of a company's business:

  • Pass off goods or services as those of another company;
  • Cause likelihood of confusion or misunderstanding as to source of goods;
  • Make false or misleading statements of fact concerning price reduction; or
  • Engage in any other conduct that similarly creates likelihood of confusion or misunderstanding.

Other states have similar DTPAs. Each Act sets guidelines on how consumers can file a claim for damages in their state. Consumers file claims with the state attorney general. In most cases, a DTPA claim is governed under that state's jurisdiction ' an issue that the emergence of e-commerce has complicated. Because companies advertise and sell online, the laws governing jurisdiction are applied differently than in the case of offline consumer sales. Most states have agreed that the location where a consumer files a claim is where jurisdiction resides. However, the proliferation of e-commerce has caused many courts to render varied decisions. While courts continue to wrestle with the issue, generally an online company that has directed its activity in a substantial way to a state is subject to jurisdiction in that state.

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.