Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Each state has incorporated a Deceptive Trade Practices Act (DTPA), but the acts aren't the same, with states tailoring their law to meet the needs of constituents and e-commerce activity within their jurisdiction.
For instance, Texas' DTPA covers these aspects of breach of warranty:
The Act also covers unconscionable acts that take advantage of consumers' lack of knowledge, capacity or ability.
The Lone Star State's act also covers false, misleading or deceptive acts, some of which include:
Illinois has a statute for business transactions called the Uniform DTPA. It defines deceptive trade practices that in the course of a company's business:
Other states have similar DTPAs. Each Act sets guidelines on how consumers can file a claim for damages in their state. Consumers file claims with the state attorney general. In most cases, a DTPA claim is governed under that state's jurisdiction ' an issue that the emergence of e-commerce has complicated. Because companies advertise and sell online, the laws governing jurisdiction are applied differently than in the case of offline consumer sales. Most states have agreed that the location where a consumer files a claim is where jurisdiction resides. However, the proliferation of e-commerce has caused many courts to render varied decisions. While courts continue to wrestle with the issue, generally an online company that has directed its activity in a substantial way to a state is subject to jurisdiction in that state.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?