Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

COURT WATCH

By Susan H. Morton and David W. Oppenheim
August 26, 2003

Franchisor Did Not Commit Fraud Concerning Transfer Approval

The Kentucky Court of Appeals has recently affirmed a trial court's decision to grant summary judgment in favor of a franchisor against the purchaser of one Holiday Inn hotel franchise where the purchaser alleged that it purchased the franchise based on the franchisor's oral representations that it would approve the transfer unconditionally, but the franchisor later conditioned approval on renovation of the hotel. Rivermont Inn, Inc. v. Bass Hotels and Resorts, Inc. and Holiday Hospitality Franchising, Inc., 2003 WL 1786650 (Ky. App. 2003).

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.