Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Sales of recorded music in the United States and throughout the world have declined for three consecutive years. Three of the five major record companies are now reportedly for sale. Lay-offs are decimating record industry professionals.
The International Federation of the Phonographic Industry blames the situation on CD burning and unauthorized Internet file sharing. The problem can be traced in large part to the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998. In negotiations for drafting the law, the record labels agreed to make Internet Service Providers (ISPs) immune from copyright infringement liability for the acts of those subscribing to their services. This was part of the quid pro quo for giving owners of musical recordings the exclusive right to digitally transmit masters on the Internet. Because they could not attack the ISPs for allowing such services as Napster to exist, the record labels began attacking the file-sharing services.
In this author's opinion, the solution to the music industry's woes is a federal law providing for a statutory license that would legalize the sharing of music online while compensating copyright owners for lost sales. A federal law implementing a statutory license could legalize the transmission of all recorded music for purposes of sharing music over the Internet and downloading permanent, portable copies. Fees would be paid by those directly profiting from file sharing, that is, the makers of CD burners, including computer manufacturers, and the ISPs whose subscribers already pay in part for access to such services as Kazaa. As CD sales continued to decline due an ever increasing number of households acquiring computers and high speed Internet connections, the amount payable to the fund could be adjusted upwards.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?