Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The United States District Court for the District of Hawaii recently ruled in favor of Defendant Motion Picture Association of America (MPAA) and against InternetMovies.com in a case that underscores the broad powers afforded to copyright holders under the Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA).
In Michael J. Rossi dba InternetMovies.com v. Motion Picture Association of America et al., No. CV 0200239 HG, the court ruled that the DMCA does not require a copyright holder to conduct an investigation to establish actual infringement prior to sending notice to an Internet Service Provider (ISP) demanding closure of an allegedly infringing Web site. Under the DMCA, a copyright holder need only assert a 'good faith belief' of infringement to engender an investigation of the accused.
The plaintiff, a Web site with an online directory of artists' works and Internet news magazine providing information and resources about movies on the Internet, filed suit against the MPAA last year as a result of a series of cease and desist orders that accused the plaintiff of distributing unauthorized copies of copyrighted motion pictures. MPAA's complaints ultimately resulted in the shutdown of the defendant's Web site. One of the violations noted by the MPAA was the unauthorized publication of the upcoming third installment of J.R.R. Tolkien's Lord of the Rings trilogy, 'Lord of the Rings: Return of the King,' which is due to be released in December 2003. The MPAA failed to prove that any such violations occurred.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Making partner isn't cheap, and the cost is more than just the years of hard work and stress that associates put in as they reach for the brass ring.