Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Class Action Certified for Wage Claim Under State Law
A class action brought on behalf of 15,000 present and former members of Bloomingdale's commissioned sales force was certified under New York Labor Law '193 based on a claim that Bloomingdale's inappropriately made deductions from the commissions credited to the sales force for merchandise returned by customers. Jacobs v. Bloomingdale's, Inc. Index No. 17283/96 (Sup. Ct. Queens Co. 5/03) (Taylor, J.S.C.)
The class representatives were sales staff members at various Bloomingdale's, May Department Stores, Macy's, and Abraham & Strauss locations. Plaintiffs acknowledged that the stores were entitled to deduct for unreturned items that they sold. The plaintiffs objected, however, to the practice of making deductions from credited commissions for 'unidentified returns,' that is, returned merchandise for which the store could not identify the salesperson involved in the transaction. The defendant stores deducted a pro rata share of the unidentified returns from all the commissions which were paid to all sales personnel in the department from which the product was sold.
The complaint in the case sought contract damages for unpaid wages, and raised a claim under Labor Law '193 for unlawful deductions from wages. Plaintiffs moved for an order pursuant to CPLR 901 and 902 for class action certification. The court granted certification for a class 'comprised of all past or present commission sales employees of the defendants in New York State whose commission wages had been reduced and/or affected because of unidentified returns.'
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?