Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
An employee may defeat a motion for summary judgment by raising a triable issue of fact relating to either the falsity of the employer's explanation for a challenged action or the employer's discriminatory motive. Morse v. Wyoming Co. Comm. Hosp. and Nursing Facility, 2003 WL 2008825 (4th Dept. 5/2/03) (Wisner, J.P., Scudder, Kehoe, Gorski and Lawton, JJ.).
Discrimination cases decided under the State Human Rights Law (SHRL) are governed by the same standards that govern cases brought under Title VII. Therefore, the Appellate Division held, the United States Supreme Court's rejection of the 'pretext-plus' rule in claims brought pursuant to Title VII rendered the 'pretext-plus' rule inapplicable to discrimination cases brought pursuant to the SHRL. The Appellate Division reversed the lower court, which improperly placed the burden on the employee of proving not only pretext, but also discrimination.
For Plaintiff-Appellant, Offerman, Cassano, Greco & Slisz, LLP, by Kevin P. Wicka, Buffalo.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?