Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Trademark Infringement Claim Not Covered Under 'Advertising Injury' Provision
In Sport Supply Group, Inc. v. Columbia Cas. Co., 335 F.3d 453 (5th Cir. Tex. July 7, 2003), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (applying Texas law) affirmed a district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of an insurer holding that allegations of trademark infringement were not covered under the provisions of the insurance policy relating to “advertising injury.” The court held that the claim of trademark infringement was excluded by the policy's exclusion for “advertising injury arising out of … breach of contract, other than misappropriation of advertising ideas under an implied contract.”
This suit arose after settlement of an underlying dispute between Sport Supply Inc. (“Sport Supply”) and MacMark Corp. (“MacMark”) over the interpretation of a licensing agreement that allowed Sport Supply to use MacMark's “Macgregor” trademark on certain sporting goods. Sport Supply brought a declaratory action in Texas state court seeking a declaration that it was not in breach of the licensing agreement. MacMark filed a counterclaim alleging breach of the licensing agreement by attempting to sell products bearing the “Macgregor” trademark on the Internet. After the declaratory action was settled, Sport Supply requested its insurer, Columbia Casualty Company, (“Columbia”) to pay a portion of the cost of defending MacMark's counterclaim of trademark infringement. Sport Supply filed suit against Columbia alleging that the insurer was required to reimburse Sport Supply for defense costs. Sport Supply also filed suit against RSKCo., the loss adjusting company, on various state law claims.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Making partner isn't cheap, and the cost is more than just the years of hard work and stress that associates put in as they reach for the brass ring.