Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

CASE NOTES

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
September 01, 2003

Asbestos Claims Time Barred Under Statute of Repose

Claims against contractors as installers of materials containing asbestos are time barred under the state's statute of repose; asbestos claims do not fall outside the statute of repose. Foster v. Spriggs, No. 49A05-0111-Cv-508, Ct. of App. of Indiana, June 5, 2003.

A widow brought a wrongful death lawsuit against 60 defendants, including the contractors that installed or removed certain construction materials, after her husband died as a result of exposure to products containing asbestos. The husband was employed as a pipe fitter since 1963. He allegedly was exposed to asbestos at various times throughout his career. He eventually contracted lung cancer and died on July 1, 1998. The defendants last completed work at the job site at issue at least 10 years prior to the time the plaintiff commenced her action against the defendants. The defendants moved for summary judgment, arguing that under the Indiana Construction Statute of Repose the plaintiff's claims were time barred because any work performed by the decedent at the defendant's construction sites was performed more than 10 years prior to the commencement of the plaintiff's action. The trial court granted summary judgment to the plaintiff, holding that asbestos claims fell outside the statute. The appellate court reversed and granted summary judgment to the defendants. It held that the statute was designed to protect the defendants in question because they were the installers of the materials. The court noted that the statute did not apply to manufacturers, material men or suppliers.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.