Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Part One of a Two-Part Article
We all know by now that the Sarbanes-Oxley legislation was designed to strengthen corporate governance of publicly traded companies in the wake of Enron and other corporate accounting and fraud scandals of recent years. Its focus was principally on domestic corporate conduct. However, in just the short time since its enactment in 2002, the Act has begun to have a profound impact on other areas of corporate compliance and risk management as well. One of these is the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA). See Pub. L. No. 95-213, 91 Stat. 1494 (1977); as amended by Pub. L. No. 100-418, 102 Stat. 1107 (1988), Pub. L. No. 105-366, 112 Stat. 3302 (1998); codified at 15 U.S.C. ” 78m, 78dd-1 et seq.
The FCPA: Requirements and Compliance Implications
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?