Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Give Me Shelter: The Appropriateness of Inter-Partner Contribution Agreements

By Leslie D. Corwin
September 01, 2003

In the wake of the recent corporate scandals, such as Enron and WorldCom it is only a matter of time before the sanctity of Limited Liability Partnerships (LLPs) is challenged. Jonathan D. Glater, 'Enron's Many Strands: Accounting; Suits Against Anderson May Test Partners' Risks,'  N.Y. Times, February 12, 2002, at C6. Providing lawyers in law firms registered as LLPs with additional liability shields from third parties will undoubtedly become a critical issue and, ultimately, it will be up to the courts to determine the scope and power of LLPs. Nevertheless, as a prophylactic device, it makes sense for law firms registered today as LLPs to consider whether it is appropriate for the partners to agree in the firm's partnership agreement to inter-partner contribution with respect to partner malpractice or other partner-generated liabilities.

To date, all U.S. jurisdictions have adopted some version of an LLP statute. Bromberg AR, Ribstein LE: Bromberg and Ribstein on Limited Liability Partnerships, The Revised Uniform Partnership Act, and The Uniform Limited Partnership Act (2001), NY, Little, Brown: '1.01(e); 2002. Many have adopted statutes similar to the Revised Uniform Partnership Act's model LLP statute, which provides limited liability for all partnership debts and obligations. Bromberg & Ribstein, '3.03. For example, California (Cal. Corp. Code ”16100 Corp. to 16962 Corp.), Connecticut (C.G.S.A. ”34-300 to 34-434), Delaware (Del. Code Ann., tit. 6 Del. C. '15-101 to 6 Del. C. '15-1210), New Jersey (N.J. Rev. Stat. NY, Little, Brown: '42:1A – 1-42:1A-56) and Texas (Vernon's Ann. Civ. St. art. 6132b-1.01 REV. CIV. STAT. To 6132b-11.04 Rev. Civ. STAT.) are among the states that have adopted versions of R.U.P.A. (For a complete listing of all the states that have adopted the R.U.P.A., see Bromberg & Ribstein, Ch.8.)

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Why So Many Great Lawyers Stink at Business Development and What Law Firms Are Doing About It Image

Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?

Bankruptcy Sales: Finding a Diamond In the Rough Image

There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.

The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

A Lawyer's System for Active Reading Image

Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.

Protecting Innovation in the Cyber World from Patent Trolls Image

With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.