Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Subtenants that sublease space in buildings where parking is made available by the prime landlord for an additional charge should make the proper arrangements with the prime landlord prior to the execution of the sublease in order to ensure that such parking is available as of the commencement of the sublease and will remain available during the term of the sublease. Most office leases that offer parking on a pay-as-you-go basis provide that the tenant loses its right to such spaces if the tenant either vacates the space and/or ceases to pay for such spaces. Office tenants seeking to trim expenses will sometimes vacate their premises and forego their monthly parking privileges and the fees for such privileges. This may automatically terminate the tenant's rights to such spaces or provide the landlord with an opportunity to recapture such spaces and/or reallocate the spaces to other users. An unwary subtenant stepping into this situation may unwittingly execute a sublease with the vacating tenant which provides that the subtenant succeeds to whatever interest the sublandlord has to appurtenant parking. Unfortunately, this may result in the subtenant's receiving no such parking rights because the sublandlord has waived its rights by its conduct. A prudent subtenant will do its homework prior to the execution of the sublease.
To be certain, a subtenant should require a written representation from the sublandlord and, preferably, from the prime landlord as well, that the parking rights appurtenant to the subleased premises will be available to the subtenant upon terms and conditions that are acceptable to the subtenant. This request may result in the prime landlord's requirement that any unpaid parking charges as of the sublease commencement date be made current. The subtenant will obviously seek to have any such back charges be borne by the sublandlord.
Subtenants that sublease space in buildings where parking is made available by the prime landlord for an additional charge should make the proper arrangements with the prime landlord prior to the execution of the sublease in order to ensure that such parking is available as of the commencement of the sublease and will remain available during the term of the sublease. Most office leases that offer parking on a pay-as-you-go basis provide that the tenant loses its right to such spaces if the tenant either vacates the space and/or ceases to pay for such spaces. Office tenants seeking to trim expenses will sometimes vacate their premises and forego their monthly parking privileges and the fees for such privileges. This may automatically terminate the tenant's rights to such spaces or provide the landlord with an opportunity to recapture such spaces and/or reallocate the spaces to other users. An unwary subtenant stepping into this situation may unwittingly execute a sublease with the vacating tenant which provides that the subtenant succeeds to whatever interest the sublandlord has to appurtenant parking. Unfortunately, this may result in the subtenant's receiving no such parking rights because the sublandlord has waived its rights by its conduct. A prudent subtenant will do its homework prior to the execution of the sublease.
To be certain, a subtenant should require a written representation from the sublandlord and, preferably, from the prime landlord as well, that the parking rights appurtenant to the subleased premises will be available to the subtenant upon terms and conditions that are acceptable to the subtenant. This request may result in the prime landlord's requirement that any unpaid parking charges as of the sublease commencement date be made current. The subtenant will obviously seek to have any such back charges be borne by the sublandlord.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.