Statewide Coordination of Mass Tort Cases Becoming Increasingly Popular

During the last few years, statewide coordination has been used increasingly to handle related cases more efficiently at the pretrial stage, such as by the use of master pleadings and master discovery demands and responses. In addition to the formal procedures of New York, California and Pennsylvania, other states such as New Jersey, Texas, Mississippi and Oregon are employing informal procedures. See Wise, supra.

Although the rules for statewide coordination in New York, California and Pennsylvania can apply to various types of actions, these rules are especially useful in dealing with mass torts because the rules enable large numbers of cases involving a specific product and similar injuries to be processed at the same time throughout the state. In fact, the Chief Administrative Judge in New York has stated that the main purpose of the new Rule 202.69 is to enable the New York state courts to handle the increasing numbers of mass tort actions more efficiently. See 'Defense News,' 69 Def. Couns. J. 136 (April 2002). When mass tort actions are coordinated statewide, 'common issues can be determined, yet each individual plaintiff is responsible for the proof of particular facts applicable to that particular plaintiff.' Jolly v. Eli Lilly & Co., 44 Cal.3d 1103, 1125, 751 P.2d 923, 938, n.19 (Calif. 1988).