Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Preliminary results from our legal spending survey shows general counsel balancing an increased need for outside counsel with pressure to reduce costs.
A stagnant economy has put pressure on departments to decrease spending, while the public's sudden interest in corporate governance has kept demand for legal services high. In August, The Corporate Counselor and The Center for Marketing Effectiveness conducted their annual survey, Benchmarking Study for Legal Services, on legal spending and the uses of outside counsel to provide insight on the factors that influence the selection and retention of outside counsel.
Preliminary results show that legal spending on outside counsel increased from 2002 to 2003; with 44% of Fortune 500 companies, and 52% of Fortune 1000 companies reporting substantial increases. Yet over 90% of respondents indicate high to moderate pressure to reduce costs. Respondents attribute the dichotomy to changes in regulation, with 89% citing it as having a high to moderate impact on their company's spending on outside counsel.
Full results will be supplied as a special supplement to the October issue of The Corporate Counselor. For now, here are some highlights:
Preliminary results from our legal spending survey shows general counsel balancing an increased need for outside counsel with pressure to reduce costs.
A stagnant economy has put pressure on departments to decrease spending, while the public's sudden interest in corporate governance has kept demand for legal services high. In August, The Corporate Counselor and The Center for Marketing Effectiveness conducted their annual survey, Benchmarking Study for Legal Services, on legal spending and the uses of outside counsel to provide insight on the factors that influence the selection and retention of outside counsel.
Preliminary results show that legal spending on outside counsel increased from 2002 to 2003; with 44% of Fortune 500 companies, and 52% of Fortune 1000 companies reporting substantial increases. Yet over 90% of respondents indicate high to moderate pressure to reduce costs. Respondents attribute the dichotomy to changes in regulation, with 89% citing it as having a high to moderate impact on their company's spending on outside counsel.
Full results will be supplied as a special supplement to the October issue of The Corporate Counselor. For now, here are some highlights:
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.