Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Wyoming Recognizes 'Loss of Chance' Cause of Action
In a case of first impression, the Supreme Court of Wyoming has recognized a cause of action for loss of last chance for survival. McMackin v. Johnson County Healthcare Center, No. 01-214, 2003 WY 91; 2003 Wyo. LEXIS 112, Sup. Ct. of Wyoming (8/1/03).
Plaintiff, the daughter of Harriette R. Brown, a woman who died at a nursing home, appealed from a partial summary judgment entered by the District Court of Johnson County, WY, in favor of defendant health care providers on the issue of whether their alleged negligent care was a cause of the patient's death.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.