Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

KickerFeaturesSectionsNews

When Should an Audit Committee Consider Independent Counsel?

By Jeffrey E. Jordan and Peter Macleod
September 01, 2003

As widely reported and discussed since July 2002, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the Act) imposes a substantial number of new responsibilities on the audit committee of a public company required to file periodic reports under the Securities Exchange Act. These responsibilities include:

  • appointing the company's registered public accountant, determining his or her compensation and overseeing his or her work (including resolution of disagreements between management and the accountant regarding financial reporting);
  • approving the receipt of audit and non-audit services from the accountant;
  • receiving the accountant's report on critical accounting policies and practices and alternative treatments of financial information discussed with management;
  • receiving complaints regarding accounting, internal controls and auditing matters; and
  • receiving reports of counsel of evidence of a material violation of securities law or breach of fiduciary duty.

The audit committee is also expected to oversee management's performance of a number of new responsibilities under the Act, including participating in the preparation of, and certifying the accuracy of, periodic reports and establishing, maintaining and assessing the effectiveness of internal controls. Further, at least under the proposed revised Nasdaq listing rules, the audit committee will be required to review and approve related-party transactions.

Need for Audit Committee Counsel

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.

Discovery of Claim Construction and Infringement Analysis May be Compelled Prior to a Markman Hearing Image

A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.