Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Law Firm Partnership & Benefits ReportLJN NewslettersNewsSections

Departing Partners: Duties and Pitfalls

By Debra Raskin
September 03, 2003

A modern day fixture of the law firm is the revolving door. See Graubard Mollen Bannett & Horowitz v. Moskovitz, 86 N.Y.2d 112, 114 (1995). As Chief Justice Rehnquist has observed: '[i]nstitutional loyalty appears to be in decline. Partners in law firms have become increasingly 'mobile,' feeling much freer than they formerly did and having much greater opportunity than they formerly did, to shift from one firm to another and take revenue-producing clients with them.' Justice William H. Rehnquist, 'The Legal Profession Today,' 62 Ind. L.J. 151, 152 (1986/1987). The increasing frequency with which partners leave law firms for new ones raises many issues concerning the permissibility of a withdrawing attorney's conduct regarding client/attorney solicitation, removal of client files or other documents and breach of anti-competition clauses in partnership agreements. In addition to adherence to the professional ethical rules, a partner is subject to a fiduciary duty to his firm and is thus constrained by such duty throughout the life of the partnership. See Gibbs v. Breed, Abbott & Morgan, 271 A.D.2d 180, 184-85 (N.Y. App. Div. 2000).

Law partners are bound to their firms by a fiduciary duty requiring 'the punctilio of honor the most sensitive.' Graubard, 86 N.Y.2d at 118 (quoting Meinhard v. Salmon, 249 N.Y. 458, 464 (1928)). Law partners are similarly bound as fiduciaries to their clients. These dual duties can come into conflict in a myriad of ways when a partner simultaneously wishes to exercise his or her right of unrestricted job mobility and look out for the best interests of his client.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
The DOJ's Corporate Enforcement Policy: One Year Later Image

The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.

Use of Deferred Prosecution Agreements In White Collar Investigations Image

This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.

The DOJ's New Parameters for Evaluating Corporate Compliance Programs Image

The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.

How AI Has Affected PR Image

When we consider how the use of AI affects legal PR and communications, we have to look at it as an industrywide global phenomenon. A recent online conference provided an overview of the latest AI trends in public relations, and specifically, the impact of AI on communications. Here are some of the key points and takeaways from several of the speakers, who provided current best practices, tips, concerns and case studies.

CLE Shouldn't Be the Only Mandatory Training for Attorneys Image

Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.