Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Index
Cooperatives & Condominiums
Business Judgment Rule Requires Judicial Deference to Co-op Decision
40 West 67th Street Corp. v. Pullman
Preferential Sublet Provisions Violate BCL 501(c)
Speigel v. 1065 Park Avenue Corp.
Development
Area Variance Denial Not Supported by Substantial Evidence
Matter of Crystal Pond Homes, Inc. v. Prior
Recording Studio Does Not Constitute Home Occupation
In re Mason v. Department of Buildings
Denial of Special Permit Supported by Substantial Evidence
Matter of Dries v. Town Board
Landlord & Tenant
Termination for Planned Demolition Raises Questions of Fact
Oriburger, Inc. v. B.W.H.N.V. Associates
Roommate Law Inapplicable When Rooms Have Separate Locks
2328 Uniave Corp. v. Beheler
Real Property Law
Servient Owner May Be Liable for Breach of Duty to Warn
Piluso v. Bell Atlantic Corp.
Deficiency Judgment Barred As Untimely
Arbor National Commercial Mortgage, LLC v. Carmans Plaza, LLC
Transfer to Related Entity Does Not Trigger First Refusal Right
New York Tile Wholesale Corp. v. Thomas Fatato Realty Corp.
Prescriptive Easement Runs to Successors-in-Interest
Gelmart Industries, Inc. v. Hubert
Cooperatives & Condominiums
Business Judgment Rule Requires Judicial Deference to Co-op Decision
40 West 67th Street Corp. v. Pullman
Preferential Sublet Provisions Violate BCL 501(c)
Speigel v. 1065 Park Avenue Corp.
Development
Area Variance Denial Not Supported by Substantial Evidence
Matter of Crystal Pond Homes, Inc. v. Prior
Recording Studio Does Not Constitute Home Occupation
In re Mason v. Department of Buildings
Denial of Special Permit Supported by Substantial Evidence
Matter of Dries v. Town Board
Landlord & Tenant
Termination for Planned Demolition Raises Questions of Fact
Oriburger, Inc. v. B.W.H.N.V. Associates
Roommate Law Inapplicable When Rooms Have Separate Locks
2328 Uniave Corp. v. Beheler
Real Property Law
Servient Owner May Be Liable for Breach of Duty to Warn
Piluso v. Bell Atlantic Corp.
Deficiency Judgment Barred As Untimely
Arbor National Commercial Mortgage, LLC v. Carmans Plaza, LLC
Transfer to Related Entity Does Not Trigger First Refusal Right
Prescriptive Easement Runs to Successors-in-Interest
Gelmart Industries, Inc. v. Hubert
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers
In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit
Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.