Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Confused about when a real property landlord or equipment lessor can commence charging post-petition rental payments? Does a debtor's obligation under Section 365(d)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code, (hereinafter, the 'Code') to timely perform all obligations arising after the order for relief (or under Section 365(d)(10), 60 days after the order of relief), mean those obligations that 'arise' by virtue of actual post-petition use of the property as opposed to obligations that arise by virtue of the 'due date' of the rental payment by contract or invoice?
The two competing theories advanced in determining what obligations should be deemed a post-petition obligation under Section 365(d)(3) of the Code are: 1) the proration rule (majority approach); and 2) the billing date or performance date rule (minority approach). To date, three Circuits have addressed these theories as applied to non-residential real property leases. See In re Montgomery Ward Holding Corp., 268 F.3d 205 (3rd Cir. 2001); In re Koenig Sporting Goods, Inc., 203 F.3d 986 (6th Cir. 2000); In re Handy Andy Home Improvement Ctrs., Inc., 144 F.3d 1125 (7th Cir. 1998). To date, no Circuit has addressed this issue with respect to equipment leases. Discussed below is the treatment by other courts of this issue with regard to equipment lessors.
Section 365(d)(3) of the Bankruptcy Code
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
As businesses across various industries increasingly adopt blockchain, it will become a critical source of discoverable electronically stored information. The potential benefits of blockchain for e-discovery and data preservation are substantial, making it an area of growing interest and importance.