Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the May issue, author Pauline Clark discussed the Rhode Island Supreme Court's decision in Oliveira v. Lombardi, 794 A.2d 453 (R.I. 2002), holding that automobile leasing companies may be held liable under the state's vicarious liability statute for the negligence of drivers operating motor vehicles titled in the leasing companies' name. In a clear response to this and other similar cases, Ford Credit has announced that it plans to exit automobile leasing in Rhode Island in October 2003 and in New York after July 9, 2003.
The company noted specifically that Rhode Island's vicarious liability law has already caused finance companies to resolve litigation by making 'significant payouts.' It is hoped, however, that the pullout will not be permanent. Putting the issue squarely in the lap of state lawmakers, Ford credit regional manager, June Awad stated, 'we realize that the Rhode Island legislature is considering legislation that would remedy the situation. Ford Credit fully and actively supports this legislation and, if it is signed into law, we will continue to lease there.'
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
This article discusses the practical and policy reasons for the use of DPAs and NPAs in white-collar criminal investigations, and considers the NDAA's new reporting provision and its relationship with other efforts to enhance transparency in DOJ decision-making.
The parameters set forth in the DOJ's memorandum have implications not only for the government's evaluation of compliance programs in the context of criminal charging decisions, but also for how defense counsel structure their conference-room advocacy seeking declinations or lesser sanctions in both criminal and civil investigations.
Each stage of an attorney's career offers opportunities for a curriculum that addresses both the individual's and the firm's need to drive success.
A defendant in a patent infringement suit may, during discovery and prior to a <i>Markman</i> hearing, compel the plaintiff to produce claim charts, claim constructions, and element-by-element infringement analyses.