Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
The Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2003 (the '2003 Tax Act' or, simply, the 'Act'), signed by President Bush into law on May 28, 2003, provides strong inducements for the purchase of capital equipment. Together with record-low interest rates, the Act's 'tax subsidies' for the purchase of equipment should reduce the costs of equipment to equipment lessors and make them more competitive with asset-based lenders.
The 2003 Tax Act's inducements for the purchase of capital equipment are the increase in the maximum dollar amount of the cost of equipment that may be expensed under Internal Revenue Code ('Code') Section 179 from $25,000 to $100,000 for qualifying small businesses, and an increase from 30% to 50% together with an extension through 2004 (December 31, 2005 in certain cases) of the additional first-year depreciation that may be taken for qualifying equipment. In combination, these two measures can dramatically accelerate the deductions available for the year equipment is purchased and placed in service.
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.