Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Courthouse Steps

By ALM Staff | Law Journal Newsletters |
September 12, 2003

CASE CAPTION: Michael Bolton and Mr. Bolton's Music Inc. v. TIG Insurance Co., L. A. Superior Court # BC297864.

CAUSES OF ACTION: Breach of contract, and breach of implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.

COMPLAINT ALLEGATIONS: This action arises out of a claim for copyright infringement brought by the Isley Brothers' publisher over the song 'Love Is a Wonderful Thing,' co-authored by Bolton and Andy Goldmark. TIG insured Time-Warner Inc. and its subsidiaries, which included Warner Chappell Music Ltd., also a defendant in the copyright action. Bolton and Bolton Music were additional insureds. TIG agreed to defend the action but failed to inform Bolton of the potential and actual conflicts of interests in having one attorney represent different parties whose positions were not necessarily aligned. In addition, TIG rejected opportunities for a reasonable settlement despite losing on summary judgment. TIG did not inform Bolton that during a settlement conference, the judge informed the defendants that the case could be settled that day for between $600,000 and $800,000. The trial ultimately resulted in a verdict that was affirmed on appeal. Bolton was held personally liable for about $900,000, Sony (Bolton's record label) for $4.2 million and Warner Chappell (which had the publishing contract) for about $76,000. TIG has now sought to collect the entire amount from Bolton by instituting litigation against him in England and Connecticut, seeking more than $12 million. This came after TIG controlled the initial litigation to protect its own interests and paid the amounts attributable to Sony, which was not even TIG's insured.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.

The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions Image

UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?