Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Franchising: Once You Start, Can You Stop?

BY Eric H. Karp
September 16, 2003

If a company ceases to expand its brand and market penetration through the sale of franchises as part of a plan to convert to an employee-based operation, is it exposed to liability for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing? The answer is yes, according to one California appellate court. In Sherman v. Master Protection Corp., 2002 WL 31854905 (Cal. App. 6 Dist. Dec. 18, 2002)(rev. den. April 9, 2003) [Business Franchise Guide (CCH) '12,503], a non-published decision, a unanimous three-judge panel of the California Court of Appeal for the Sixth District recently awarded damages and legal fees to a franchisee on that very basis.

In Sherman, the defendant, Master Protection Corporation (MPC), used the brand name 'FireMaster' to market and service fire protection equipment. The plaintiff, Michael Sherman, purchased franchises from MPC in 1987 and 1991 for the sums of $40,000 and $60,000, respectively. He paid nothing down; the purchase price for each franchise was set by the franchisor and based on the gross sales for the previous year; the entire price was paid for by promissory notes of Sherman to MPC.

Each franchise agreement recited that Sherman had the right to sell or assign it rights under the agreement subject to a right of first refusal in favor of MPC, and if not exercised, to a buyer approved by MPC. The franchisee was required to meet annual increasing sales targets. Because the purchase price of MPC franchises was tied to sales, their value thus increased as sales rose. When Sherman purchased his franchises, 100 percent of the sales of FireMaster were through MPC franchises.

Read These Next
Yachts, Jets, Horses & Hooch: Specialized Commercial Leasing Models Image

Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.

Hyperlinked Documents: The Latest e-Discovery Challenge Image

As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.

Identifying Your Practice's Differentiator Image

How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.

Risks and Ad Fraud Protection In Digital Advertising Image

The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.

Turning Business Development Plans Into Reality Image

This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.