Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
In the Spotlight: Tenants Should Seek Flexibility in Negotiating Parking Privileges
Lease provisions that provide for the tenant to make periodic payments to the landlord for parking privileges are often unclear as to whether the tenant is required to pay for the availability of such spaces, whether or not the tenant utilizes them. Because parking is typically dealt with either as an attachment to the lease or in a provision of the lease that is distinct from the rent provision, parking charges are typically not included within the definition of 'rent.' Because of this, a tenant may have a technical argument that it does not owe the landlord parking charges unless it actually uses the available parking. If a landlord (and/or its mortgage lender) are relying on the income stream from the parking area, this ambiguity is troublesome. From the tenant's perspective, if the tenant seeks the flexibility of utilizing the parking on a pay-as-it-goes basis, it should not settle for ambiguity, but should negotiate a provision that specifically allows the tenant to utilize parking privileges at its election and only pay for such privileges for the duration of time that it actually uses them.
William Crowe is a partner with Mayo, Gilligan & Zito in Wethersfield, CT
Lease provisions that provide for the tenant to make periodic payments to the landlord for parking privileges are often unclear as to whether the tenant is required to pay for the availability of such spaces, whether or not the tenant utilizes them. Because parking is typically dealt with either as an attachment to the lease or in a provision of the lease that is distinct from the rent provision, parking charges are typically not included within the definition of 'rent.' Because of this, a tenant may have a technical argument that it does not owe the landlord parking charges unless it actually uses the available parking. If a landlord (and/or its mortgage lender) are relying on the income stream from the parking area, this ambiguity is troublesome. From the tenant's perspective, if the tenant seeks the flexibility of utilizing the parking on a pay-as-it-goes basis, it should not settle for ambiguity, but should negotiate a provision that specifically allows the tenant to utilize parking privileges at its election and only pay for such privileges for the duration of time that it actually uses them.
William Crowe is a partner with Mayo, Gilligan & Zito in Wethersfield, CT
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?