Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

Bit Parts

By Stan Soocher
October 01, 2003

Concert Promotion Testimony Excluded. A Manhattan federal court has granted a motion by defendant booking agencies to exclude expert witness testimony from a racial discrimination suit by minority-owned music promoters. Rowe Entertainment Inc. v. The William Morris Agency Inc., 98-8272. The district court concluded, among other things, that the plaintiffs' expert witness had relied on the plaintiffs' amended complaint to estimate the defendants' market share and had taken no steps to verify the accuracy of the data that the plaintiffs had given him.

Request for Client Files Rejected. The Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate Division, decided that the law firm of prominent entertainment attorney Kenneth Ziffren will not have to produce 52,683 client files at a projected cost of $6 million for Ziffren's divorce proceeding with his wife, Marcia. Ziffren, Brittenham, Branca, Fischer, Gilbert-Lurie & Stiffelman, B167832. Marcia had sought the documents to determine her community interest in the firm. The documents' limited probative value was “greatly outweighed” by the burden of producing them and the intrusion into of the privacy rights of the Ziffren firm's clients, the court noted in its unpublished opinion. The court concluded that the community interest could be estimated from the large amount of documentation already handed over by Ziffren or his firm.

No 'Brotherhood' Injunction. The U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire refused to issue a preliminary injunction to bar the premiere of producer David Kelley's new series “The Brotherhood of Poland, New Hampshire.” MJM Productions v. Kelley Productions Inc., 03-390. In its unpublished opinion, the district court found insufficient evidence that the defendants intentionally copied the plaintiffs' “Brotherhood” film title or that the plaintiffs had established secondary meaning in the name. On likelihood of consumer confusion, the court noted, “A nationally broadcast television program and a film which has been shown only twice cannot be said to be similar goods, share channels of trade, or target the same classes of purchasers.”

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws Image

This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York Image

In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?

Legal Possession: What Does It Mean? Image

Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.