Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Part Two of a Two-Part Article
Over the past year, most issuers have been preoccupied with the basics of Sarbanes-Oxley compliance, with the result that some of the subtler compliance implications have not yet been fully appreciated. However, as discussed last month, it is evident that the provisions of the Act will have implications for compliance in all substantive areas in which a company maintains a compliance program, but especially those having payment and financial dimensions, such as the FCPA Section 302, already mentioned in the disclosure discussion last month. Section 302 requires the periodic certifications to state that appropriate disclosures to the Board and auditors have been made with respect to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in internal controls. Section 404 provides for each annual report of an issuer to contain an internal control report, and for attestation by the external auditors of management's internal control assessment. Section 406 requires a code of corporate ethics for senior financial officers, which is defined to include compliance with law obligations. Section 906 contains new criminal penalties for false certifications.
FCPA Compliance Implications
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.