Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
As in the United States, franchisors in the United Kingdom usually invest in protecting their brand by way of trademark registrations, usually a Community Trade Mark (CTM). However, although they spend a considerable amount of time, money, and resources developing their customer databases and refining their business methodologies and know-how (and detailing this in the franchise Operations Manual, to which their franchisees and employees are given access), U.S. franchisors rarely seem to devote the same resources to protecting these trade secrets in the United Kingdom.
Trade secrets are extremely vulnerable. Franchisees, master franchisors, developers, subfranchisors, and their employees in the United Kingdom all enjoy a full working knowledge of the franchisor's trade secrets. They are all, therefore, in an excellent position to compete for the franchisor's market share. Sometimes even prospective franchisees acquire a good deal of valuable information. If any such persons leave the franchisor's network, unless the franchisor's trade secrets are adequately protected, they can become its strongest competitor. Indeed, there are many examples of franchises that have been established by former franchisees of a rival brand.
In the United Kingdom, technology and designs can be protected by obtaining statutory monopolies by way of patent and design registrations. However, a great deal of information cannot be protected by registration. This includes copyrights, technical data, marketing plans, business strategies, customer information, sensitive employee details, special sources of supply, customer lists, manufacturing processes, customer service goals, business methods and technology, financial results, and forecasts and operating manuals. Instead in the United Kingdom, franchisors must look to and rely on the common law to protect their interests. Although the law on trade secrets in the United Kingdom has developed on a case-by-case, piecemeal basis, six general factors have emerged that the courts and franchisors can use to determine whether information constitutes a trade secret:
In addition to the six factors above, UK courts have drawn a distinction between trade secrets and information learned by franchisees or employees that forms part of their general skills and knowledge.
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?