Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Recently, the Court of Special Appeals of Maryland held that a letter of intent was binding on the parties. Windsor Development, L.L.C. v. Clearcomm Technologies, Inc., No. 999 (Md.App. filed Aug. 5, 2002). The court granted a summary judgment motion enforcing the provisions of the letter of intent relying on the “plain and unambiguous” language.
In Windsor, the potential landlord, Windsor, and the potential tenant, Clearcomm, executed a letter of intent specifying the terms of a commercial lease agreement. The letter of intent required Clearcomm to post a nonrefundable deposit of $5,000 at the time of execution of the letter of intent. The letter of intent also required Clearcomm to post an additional nonrefundable deposit of $10,000 to be paid upon the execution of the lease. Windsor was to apply $8,000 of the foregoing deposits to rent and the remaining $7,000 was to be held as the security deposit under the lease. The letter of intent contained a rent schedule and an option for Clearcomm to rent additional space in the building.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Why is it that those who are best skilled at advocating for others are ill-equipped at advocating for their own skills and what to do about it?
There is no efficient market for the sale of bankruptcy assets. Inefficient markets yield a transactional drag, potentially dampening the ability of debtors and trustees to maximize value for creditors. This article identifies ways in which investors may more easily discover bankruptcy asset sales.
The DOJ's Criminal Division issued three declinations since the issuance of the revised CEP a year ago. Review of these cases gives insight into DOJ's implementation of the new policy in practice.
Active reading comprises many daily tasks lawyers engage in, including highlighting, annotating, note taking, comparing and searching texts. It demands more than flipping or turning pages.
With trillions of dollars to keep watch over, the last thing we need is the distraction of costly litigation brought on by patent assertion entities (PAEs or "patent trolls"), companies that don't make any products but instead seek royalties by asserting their patents against those who do make products.