Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Med Mal News
Connecticut Lawmakers Hold Hearings on Malpractice Reform
In testimony before Connecticut's Legislative Program Review Committee on September 18, the state's insurance commissioner, Susan Cogswell, urged lawmakers to set a $250,000 cap on pain and suffering awards as a remedy for the state's medical malpractice insurance crisis. Also taking part in the 5-hour hearing were advocates for the medical profession, insurance industry, victims of medical malpractice and attorneys. The state's largest medical malpractice insurer, Connecticut Medical Insurance Co., was represented by its CEO, Denise Funk, who testified that a $250,000 cap on non-economic damages would allow the company to immediately lower premiums by 10%.
Victims' advocate George Meder, whose child died during outpatient surgery for an ear condition 3 years ago, pointed out to the legislators, however, that Connecticut ranks 40th among states in disciplining its doctors for substandard performance. He maintained that it was more important to the cause of reducing medical malpractice insurance premiums for doctors who are repeat offenders to be prevented from practicing. Defense attorney Roland F. Young III suggested to the legislators that defense counsel should be informed at the outset of a case as to which doctor had certified the matter as worthy of suit, so that legitimacy of grounds for the action could be evaluated earlier.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.
The Anti-Assignment Override Provisions
UCC Sections 9406(d) and 9408(a) are one of the most powerful, yet least understood, sections of the Uniform Commercial Code. On their face, they appear to override anti-assignment provisions in agreements that would limit the grant of a security interest. But do these sections really work?