Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Second Circuit Affirms Ruling On Tarzan Rights
The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit decided that illustrations and introductions for two Tarzan books made by artist Burne Hogarth at the “instance and expense” of the estate of Tarzan creator Edgar Rice Burroughs (ERB) were works for hire. The Estate of Hogarth v. Edgar Rice Burroughs Inc. (ERB), 02-7312. Thus, Burroughs' estate retained the original and renewal copyrights in the books.
Affirming a district court ruling in favor of ERB, the appeals court noted that the two books, “Tarzan of the Apes” and “Jungle Tales of Tarzan,” “are derivative works based on original works for which ERB held the copyrights, and … in such circumstances the copyright proprietor has the right to 'direct and supervise' the work of the commissioned party, sufficient to render it a work for hire.”
The Second Circuit further held that there was no statute of limitations bar to ERB's claim of ownership of the copyrights. Rather than accruing when competing copyright registration forms were filed for the disputed works in the 1970s, the appeals court emphasized that the 3-year statute of limitations under the U.S. Copyright Act accrued in 1999, when Hogarth's heirs asserted the copyrights in a letter to the Walt Disney over the release of a Tarzan movie.
This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
- Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
- Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
- Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
Major Differences In UK, U.S. Copyright Laws
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
The Article 8 Opt In
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
Removing Restrictive Covenants In New York
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?
Legal Possession: What Does It Mean?
Possession of real property is a matter of physical fact. Having the right or legal entitlement to possession is not "possession," possession is "the fact of having or holding property in one's power." That power means having physical dominion and control over the property.