Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%
Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
Shadow Directors and Controlling Shareholders: Duties and Liability
The meltdown and the consequent disappointments have produced a wave (actual and threatened) of litigation, alleging the VCs, through the board seats of their appointees, were in “control” of failed companies (dot-coms and others), and therefore obligated to exercise “fiduciary” care over the fortunes of minority shareholders. And, the deep-pocketed VCs have, of course, been taking evasive action. Their time-honored gambits are, first, to eschew a board seat and substitute instead “observer” or “visitation” rights – the right to sit in attendance at all board meetings and speak one's piece ' but not vote. Given the muscle the VCs enjoy, by keeping their hand on the money spigot, this usually amounts to the same thing as a board seat. This is a practice known in the UK as “shadow directors.” I am informed by my UK compadres that liability can attach as if the individual VC was, de jure as well as de facto, sitting on the board.
One step further removed is the assertion of rights through negative covenants. This takes advantage of the well-recognized doctrine in US law that a shareholder may behave in any way he or she sees fit in exercising shareholders rights, in contrast to one's obligation as a director to respect and further the interests of all the shareholders.
Up to now the selfish shareholder has not been deemed to have created a cause of action. Nonetheless, as stated above there is a companion doctrine in U.S. law that a “controlling” shareholder has fiduciary duties to the minority; and it has recently been argued, in a case in which I am involved, that the negative covenants in favor of a shareholder, even a minority shareholder, create the necessary quantum of “control” to get the plaintiffs past the preliminary motions stage ' the equivalent of victory in most litigation.
Yachts, Jets, Horses & Hooch: Specialized Commercial Leasing Models
Defining commercial real estate asset class is essentially a property explaining how it identifies — not necessarily what its original intention was or what others think it ought to be. This article discusses, from a general issue-spot and contextual analysis perspective, how lawyers ought to think about specialized leasing formats and the regulatory backdrops that may inform what the documentation needs to contain for compliance purposes.
Hyperlinked Documents: The Latest e-Discovery Challenge
As courts and discovery experts debate whether hyperlinked content should be treated the same as traditional attachments, legal practitioners are grappling with the technical and legal complexities of collecting, analyzing and reviewing these documents in real-world cases.
Identifying Your Practice's Differentiator
How to Convey Your Merits In a Way That Earns Trust, Clients and Distinctions Just as no two individuals have the exact same face, no two lawyers practice in their respective fields or serve clients in the exact same way. Think of this as a "Unique Value Proposition." Internal consideration about what you uniquely bring to your clients, colleagues, firm and industry can provide untold benefits for your law practice.
Risks and Ad Fraud Protection In Digital Advertising
The ever-evolving digital marketing landscape, coupled with the industry-wide adoption of programmatic advertising, poses a significant threat to the effectiveness and integrity of digital advertising campaigns. This article explores various risks to digital advertising from pixel stuffing and ad stacking to domain spoofing and bots. It will also explore what should be done to ensure ad fraud protection and improve effectiveness.
Turning Business Development Plans Into Reality
This article offers practical insights and best practices to navigate the path from roadmap to rainmaking, ensuring your business development efforts are not just sporadic bursts of activity, but an integrated part of your daily success.