Law.com Subscribers SAVE 30%

Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.

VeriSign Suspends Site Finder Service

By Samuel Fineman, Esquire
October 01, 2003

VeriSign Inc., the leading provider of infrastructure services for the Internet and charged with managing the .com and .net Internet name registries, recently suspended its Site Finder service because the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which oversees the Internet's domain-naming system, ordered it to shut down the service. (See related story in Internet Law & Strategy, “Netster.com Sues VeriSign Over Antitrust Claims” (September, 2003)).

VeriSign executive VP Russell Lewis says the company “reluctantly” suspended the SiteFinder service, even though it didn't have a “contractual obligation to do so.” ICANN's version of the facts is slightly different. According to a recent letter sent by ICANN to VeriSign, if VeriSign failed to comply with the order, ICANN would have “no choice but to seek promptly to enforce VeriSign's contractual obligations.”

The contretemps began when VeriSign began directing all mistyped URLs ' some 20 million a day ' to Site Finder instead of sending back the usual “no domain” or “page not found” error message. Web surfers who mistyped a URL were sent to a Site Finder page, where they would see a VeriSign controlled page that offered a search engine and links to what Site Finder guessed users were attempting to reach.

ICANN argued that the Site Finder service had significant adverse effects on the Internet, Web browsing, E-mail, applications and sequenced lookup services, and that it produced incompatibility problems with other services. Critics of VeriSign have alleged Site Finder produced problems with everything from spam filters to network printers.

For its part, VeriSign has disputed those allegations and says the SiteFinder service had little impact on the Internet. VeriSign contended that the company is in strict compliance with all Internet standards and the Internet Architecture Board.

VeriSign Inc., the leading provider of infrastructure services for the Internet and charged with managing the .com and .net Internet name registries, recently suspended its Site Finder service because the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN), which oversees the Internet's domain-naming system, ordered it to shut down the service. (See related story in Internet Law & Strategy, “Netster.com Sues VeriSign Over Antitrust Claims” (September, 2003)).

VeriSign executive VP Russell Lewis says the company “reluctantly” suspended the SiteFinder service, even though it didn't have a “contractual obligation to do so.” ICANN's version of the facts is slightly different. According to a recent letter sent by ICANN to VeriSign, if VeriSign failed to comply with the order, ICANN would have “no choice but to seek promptly to enforce VeriSign's contractual obligations.”

The contretemps began when VeriSign began directing all mistyped URLs ' some 20 million a day ' to Site Finder instead of sending back the usual “no domain” or “page not found” error message. Web surfers who mistyped a URL were sent to a Site Finder page, where they would see a VeriSign controlled page that offered a search engine and links to what Site Finder guessed users were attempting to reach.

ICANN argued that the Site Finder service had significant adverse effects on the Internet, Web browsing, E-mail, applications and sequenced lookup services, and that it produced incompatibility problems with other services. Critics of VeriSign have alleged Site Finder produced problems with everything from spam filters to network printers.

For its part, VeriSign has disputed those allegations and says the SiteFinder service had little impact on the Internet. VeriSign contended that the company is in strict compliance with all Internet standards and the Internet Architecture Board.

This premium content is locked for Entertainment Law & Finance subscribers only

  • Stay current on the latest information, rulings, regulations, and trends
  • Includes practical, must-have information on copyrights, royalties, AI, and more
  • Tap into expert guidance from top entertainment lawyers and experts

For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473

Read These Next
Strategy vs. Tactics: Two Sides of a Difficult Coin Image

With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.

'Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P.': A Tutorial On Contract Liability for Real Estate Purchasers Image

In June 2024, the First Department decided Huguenot LLC v. Megalith Capital Group Fund I, L.P., which resolved a question of liability for a group of condominium apartment buyers and in so doing, touched on a wide range of issues about how contracts can obligate purchasers of real property.

The Article 8 Opt In Image

The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.

CoStar Wins Injunction for Breach-of-Contract Damages In CRE Database Access Lawsuit Image

Latham & Watkins helped the largest U.S. commercial real estate research company prevail in a breach-of-contract dispute in District of Columbia federal court.

Fresh Filings Image

Notable recent court filings in entertainment law.