Call 855-808-4530 or email [email protected] to receive your discount on a new subscription.
One of the most frustrating problems in defending a trade secrets lawsuit comes when the plaintiff refuses to agree that the accused defendant may have access to, and thus learn about, the specific alleged secrets the defendant is accused of misappropriating. There are, however, two arguments defense counsel can use to win a motion for access to that information ' a victory that alone can turn the momentum in the defendant's favor.
The Problem
In trade secrets cases, plaintiffs often deny the defendant access under the protective order to the precise information at issue and argue that if the defendant were to learn it, he might misappropriate it. Without such access, defense counsel can describe the charges to the client in only general terms. This prevents the accused individual from drawing upon his personal knowledge to provide evidence that the information is in the public domain (and is thus not secret) or was independently derived. In other words, the person in the best position to refute the accusations is sidelined. In such cases, trade secrets defendants are often forced to spend large sums to hire an expert witness to rebut the plaintiff's evidence that the material is a trade secret.
ENJOY UNLIMITED ACCESS TO THE SINGLE SOURCE OF OBJECTIVE LEGAL ANALYSIS, PRACTICAL INSIGHTS, AND NEWS IN ENTERTAINMENT LAW.
Already a have an account? Sign In Now Log In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate acess, please contact Customer Service at [email protected] or 877-256-2473
This article highlights how copyright law in the United Kingdom differs from U.S. copyright law, and points out differences that may be crucial to entertainment and media businesses familiar with U.S law that are interested in operating in the United Kingdom or under UK law. The article also briefly addresses contrasts in UK and U.S. trademark law.
With each successive large-scale cyber attack, it is slowly becoming clear that ransomware attacks are targeting the critical infrastructure of the most powerful country on the planet. Understanding the strategy, and tactics of our opponents, as well as the strategy and the tactics we implement as a response are vital to victory.
The Article 8 opt-in election adds an additional layer of complexity to the already labyrinthine rules governing perfection of security interests under the UCC. A lender that is unaware of the nuances created by the opt in (may find its security interest vulnerable to being primed by another party that has taken steps to perfect in a superior manner under the circumstances.
In Rockwell v. Despart, the New York Supreme Court, Third Department, recently revisited a recurring question: When may a landowner seek judicial removal of a covenant restricting use of her land?